1. 4N30 Substitution Conclusion
Direct substitution is not recommended. The key differences lie in the significantly lower current transfer ratio (CTR) (minimum 100% for 4N30 vs. 500% for 4N33) and the shorter turn-off time (typical 40µs for 4N30 vs. 100µs for 4N33). The substantial drop in CTR means the 4N30 provides much weaker output drive capability under the same input current, which could result in insufficient load drive or inadequate circuit sensitivity. While the faster turn-off time may benefit switching speed, it may also disrupt the original circuit's timing design. Although both parts share identical critical specifications such as isolation voltage, package, and maximum output current, the gap in the core CTR parameter constitutes a "downgrade replacement." The driving conditions must be re-evaluated, and therefore direct substitution is not advised.
2. TIL113 Substitution Conclusion
Conditional substitution is possible, but the application scenario must be rigorously evaluated. The differences include a lower CTR (minimum 300% vs. 500% for 4N33), asymmetric switching characteristics (extremely fast turn-on time of 350ns and turn-off time of 55µs, compared to 4N33's 5µs/100µs), and a slightly higher Vce saturation voltage (1.25V vs. 1V). The reduced CTR will weaken output drive capability, though it is still better than that of the 4N30. The TIL113's highly asymmetric switching profile offers an advantage in high-speed turn-on applications, but the extended turn-off delay may cause pulse waveform distortion, making it unsuitable for circuits demanding high switching symmetry (such as precision timing or high-speed modulation). If the original circuit is not sensitive to CTR and switching symmetry, and can tolerate the slightly higher saturation voltage, substitution may be acceptable. Otherwise, a parameter redesign is necessary.
Analysis ID: ADC4-4645000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com