Original Part
Alternative Part
1. TPS2021DRG4 Substitution Conclusion
A direct substitution is not viable, primarily due to insufficient current capability. The maximum output current of the TPS2021DRG4 (600mA) is significantly lower than the 1A rating of the original AP2161SG-13. In applications where the original design's load current approaches or reaches 1A, the TPS2021DRG4 would be unable to sustain the demand, risking thermal overload or triggering current limit protection. Consequently, it cannot meet the same power delivery requirements.
2. TPS2022DG4 Substitution Conclusion
While a direct replacement is feasible in terms of functional interface and current rating, critical electrical differences exist, necessitating circuit compatibility evaluation. The TPS2022DG4 matches the original device in package, interface logic, rated current (1A), and supply voltage range. However, its output stage employs an N-channel MOSFET, whereas the original uses a P-channel type. Their drive-level logic is inherently opposite at the circuit level: a P-channel high-side switch is typically enabled by a low-level signal, while an N-channel high-side switch requires an internal charge pump and is enabled by a high-level signal. A direct swap could therefore prevent the original control logic from correctly switching the load. Furthermore, the TPS2022DG4 features a lower on-resistance (33mΩ), which is beneficial for reducing conduction losses. However, its fault protection lacks a "reverse current" blocking feature. This is a significant omission for applications requiring protection against current backflow from the output to the input (e.g., hot-swap or USB power management) and could compromise system safety and reliability.
Analysis ID: 988B-A623000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com



