Original Part
SRAM - Synchronous, SDR (ZBT) Memory IC 9Mbit Parallel 133 MHz 4.2 ns 165-CABGA (13x15)

Alternative Part
SRAM - Synchronous, SDR (ZBT) Memory IC 9Mbit Parallel 8 ns 165-CABGA (13x15)

SRAM - Synchronous, SDR (ZBT) Memory IC 9Mbit Parallel 8.5 ns 165-CABGA (13x15)

1. 71V65703S80BQGI Substitution Conclusion
From the perspective of key electrical parameters and physical packaging, this part is identical to the original device in terms of memory type, density, organization, interface, voltage, and package (165-CABGA), establishing a foundation for hardware pin compatibility. The key difference lies in its access time of 8 ns, which is significantly slower than the original part's 4.2 ns (corresponding to a 133 MHz clock). Consequently, the maximum sustainable operating frequency of the 71V65703S80BQGI is far lower than 133 MHz. If the original system design relies on the 133 MHz clock to meet timing and bandwidth requirements, a direct substitution will likely cause system instability or functional failure. Substitution is only feasible if the system clock can be downscaled to a lower frequency supported by this chip (typically around 100 MHz or less). It is also worth noting that the suffix "I" generally indicates an industrial-grade temperature range, which may be wider than the original commercial-grade part's range—a potential advantage.
2. 71V65703S85BQG Substitution Conclusion
This model is highly similar to the case of the 71V65703S80BQGI, sharing the same fundamental architecture and package, and thus maintaining pin compatibility with the original part. The performance difference is again the critical factor: its access time of 8.5 ns is slower than the original 4.2 ns, resulting in a maximum operating frequency that is one grade lower than the original 133 MHz. This discrepancy directly limits the achievable data throughput bandwidth and processing speed compared to the original device. The conclusion parallels the previous model: a direct substitution is not viable without reducing the system clock frequency. If a system performance downgrade is acceptable and clock timing is adjusted accordingly, hardware-level replacement is possible, though the performance margin is even tighter than that of the 8 ns version.
Analysis ID: 9F4E-68DC000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com
