Original Part
Asynchronous FIFO 2.25K (256 x 9) Uni-Directional 28.5MHz 25ns 32-PLCC (14x11.46)

Alternative Part
Asynchronous FIFO 2.25K (256 x 9) Uni-Directional 50MHz 12ns 32-PLCC (14x11.46)

Substitution Feasibility Conclusion
The 7200L12JG can serve as a replacement for the 7200L25JI provided that specific electrical and timing requirements are met; however, system compatibility and reliability risks must be evaluated. While performance improves after substitution, the applicable operating environment becomes more constrained.
Comparison Points
1. Speed and Timing Margin
- Difference: The access time of the L12JG is 12 ns (data rate 50 MHz), whereas the L25JI is 25 ns (28.5 MHz).
- Implication: The L12JG can handle higher data throughput, but imposes stricter system timing constraints (e.g., clock jitter, signal setup/hold times must meet a narrower window). If the original system lacks sufficient timing margin, direct substitution may result in data errors.
2. Operating Temperature Range
- Difference: The L12JG is rated for 0 °C to 70 °C (commercial grade), while the L25JI supports -40 °C to 85 °C (industrial grade).
- Implication: The L12JG is unsuitable for harsh high‑ or low‑temperature environments (e.g., automotive, outdoor industrial equipment). If the original design relies on a wide temperature range, substitution will reduce the system’s environmental robustness.
3. Dynamic Power and Noise Sensitivity
- Difference: Both devices share the same nominal maximum static current (80 mA), but the L12JG exhibits higher dynamic power consumption when operating at full speed (50 MHz), and its faster switching may increase power‑supply noise.
- Implication: If the original power‑supply design lacks sufficient headroom or decoupling is inadequate, substitution could introduce power‑integrity risks. Verification of supply ripple and thermal management is recommended.
4. Signal‑Integrity Requirements
- Difference: The 12 ns access time of the L12JG corresponds to higher‑frequency spectral content, making it more sensitive to PCB layout aspects such as transmission‑line matching and crosstalk control.
- Implication: Direct replacement requires re‑evaluation of trace quality; otherwise, reflections or crosstalk may cause timing violations.
Note: The two devices are fully compatible in terms of package, logical function, and expansion interface. However, the differences above essentially represent a trade‑off of “higher performance for more stringent application conditions.” Prior to substitution, timing, power‑supply, and environmental parameters of the target system should be verified through actual measurement.
Analysis ID: C851-B276000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com
