(HKG) +86 755 8277 4696
WhatsAppWhatsApp
English
SkyChip
0
Original Part

Transceiver, Non-Inverting 2 Element 8 Bit per Element 3-State Output 48-SSOP

Quote
Alternative Part

Transceiver, Non-Inverting 2 Element 8 Bit per Element 3-State Output 48-TSSOP

Quote

Transceiver, Non-Inverting 2 Element 8 Bit per Element 3-State Output 48-TSSOP

Quote
1. 74FCT162245CTPACT Substitution Conclusion From a technical parameter perspective, the 74FCT162245CTPACT is identical to the original part 74FCT16245ATPVG8 in terms of logic function, gate count, bit width, and operating voltage range, making it a potential substitute candidate. However, key differences exist in its reduced output current capability (from the original 32mA high/64mA low to 24mA high/24mA low) and its changed package footprint (from a 48-BSSOP to a narrower 48-TFSOP). The lower output current results in weaker drive strength, which may be insufficient for high-load or high-speed switching applications. The target application's load requirements must be carefully evaluated. The smaller package necessitates a PCB layout redesign to accommodate the different pin arrangement and spatial constraints, potentially increasing replacement cost and risk. In summary, substitution is feasible for low-load applications where PCB modifications are acceptable; otherwise, it is not recommended.
2. 74FCT162H245ATPACT Substitution Conclusion The 74FCT162H245ATPACT shares identical basic electrical parameters with the original 74FCT16245ATPVG8. However, it similarly exhibits the critical differences of reduced output current (from 32mA high/64mA low to 24mA high/24mA low) and a changed package (from 48-BSSOP to 48-TFSOP). The lower output current may lead to insufficient drive capability, potentially affecting system stability under heavy loads or in noisy environments. The package change requires PCB layout adaptation, which may involve rework or rerouting. Although the "H" suffix might suggest enhanced speed characteristics, the provided parameters do not indicate other performance improvements. Therefore, substitution feasibility is highly application-dependent. It may be viable if the current requirements are met and the package is compatible; otherwise, thorough validation is advised.
Analysis ID: BB94-C795000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com