(HKG) +86 755 8277 4696
WhatsAppWhatsApp
English
SkyChip
0
Original Part

SCR 200 V 1.6 A Standard Recovery Through Hole TO-39

quote
Alternative Part

SCR 200 V 1.6 A Standard Recovery Through Hole TO-39

quote

Substitution Feasibility Conclusion

The electrical performance is identical. Direct substitution is feasible, provided that soldering process and compliance requirements are met.

Comparison Points

1. Pin Surface Finish: The `PBFREE` variant uses a lead-free plating, whereas the `TIN/LEAD` variant employs a conventional tin-lead alloy plating. This directly leads to differences in soldering process requirements: lead-free components require a higher peak reflow temperature (typically 30-40°C higher) and compatibility with lead-free solder paste. The tin-lead version is compatible with traditional lead-containing solder processes. 2. Environmental Compliance: The `PBFREE` variant complies with hazardous substance restriction directives such as the EU RoHS and is suitable for products manufactured for the global market. Due to its lead content, the `TIN/LEAD` variant is generally not permitted in new product designs, and is only applicable in specific exempted fields, military applications, or for maintaining legacy product lines with established leaded processes. 3. Long-Term Reliability Tendency: Under identical thermomechanical stress, the microstructure of lead-free solder joints differs from that of tin-lead joints, resulting in different fatigue failure modes. However, for this TO-39 packaged device, under proper thermal design and application conditions, this difference typically does not pose a major risk.
Analysis ID: 9BBB-7013000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com