1. ADM3075EWYRZ Substitution Conclusion At the electrical interface and package level, the ADM3075EWYRZ can physically replace the XR3078XID-F. However, due to significant differences in key performance parameters, direct substitution feasibility is highly application‑dependent and is generally not recommended. The differences are as follows: First, data rate – the XR3078XID‑F supports high‑speed communication up to 20 Mbps, whereas the ADM3075EWYRZ is limited to 500 kbps. If the original system operates at a high data rate, replacement with the ADM3075EWYRZ will fail to meet the speed requirement, potentially causing data loss or system failure. Second, receiver hysteresis – the ADM3075EWYRZ provides 100 mV of hysteresis, substantially higher than the 25 mV of the XR3078XID‑F. This gives the ADM3075EWYRZ stronger noise immunity and stability in severely noisy environments, such as automotive electronics. However, in applications with small signal swing or very long cable runs, it may reduce receiver sensitivity. Third, quality level – the ADM3075EWYRZ is an Automotive‑grade product, with reliability, temperature range, and qualification standards far exceeding those of the commercial/industrial‑grade XR3078XID‑F. This is an advantage in high‑reliability environments like automotive or harsh industrial settings, but may introduce unnecessary cost in ordinary applications. Substitution may be considered if the target application operates below 500 kbps and demands high noise immunity and reliability, such as in automotive body‑control modules. Otherwise, especially for high‑speed data links, alternative compatible high‑speed devices should be sought.