(HKG) +86 755 8277 4696
WhatsAppWhatsApp
English
SkyChip
0
Original Part

N-Channel 600 V 34A (Tc) 250W (Tc) Through Hole TO-220

quote
Alternative Part

N-Channel 600 V 37.9A (Tc) 278W (Tc) Through Hole PG-TO220-3

quote

Substitution Feasibility Conclusion

The IPP60R099C6XKSA1 can directly replace the STP40N60M2 in terms of electrical stress (voltage/current) and package compatibility. However, significant differences exist in static and dynamic characteristics, making this a substitution with different performance parameters. The drive circuit, losses, and thermal management must be re-evaluated; it is not a drop-in replacement.

Comparison Points

1. On-Resistance and Current Capability: The ST part has an Rds(on) of 88mΩ @ 17A, while the Infineon part is rated at 99mΩ @ 18.1A. Under similar test conditions, the ST device exhibits slightly lower conduction loss. However, Infineon specifies a higher continuous drain current (37.9A), suggesting a potentially better junction-to-case thermal resistance or a different rating methodology. The practical current capability must be assessed in conjunction with the specific thermal conditions. 2. Gate Charge and Switching Performance: The ST device's Qg is 57nC, significantly lower than the 119nC of the Infineon part. At the same switching frequency, driving the Infineon device requires higher drive current and incurs greater drive losses. For high-frequency applications (e.g., switch-mode power supplies), the ST device offers advantages in switching loss and drive simplicity. The Infineon device may switch slower, necessitating a more robust gate drive stage. 3. Drive Threshold and Gate Voltage: The maximum Vgs(th) for the ST part is 4V, compared to 3.5V for the Infineon part. The Infineon device is theoretically easier to turn on, but both require approximately 10V Vgs for full enhancement. The existing drive circuit is generally compatible. Note that the Infineon part's maximum Vgs rating is ±20V, lower than ST's ±25V, providing less margin in applications with significant gate voltage spikes. 4. Technology and Loss Trade-off: ST's MDmesh™ II Plus series typically optimizes the Rds(on) Qg product, balancing conduction and switching losses. Infineon's CoolMOS™ C6 series is also designed for high efficiency, but the specific part in this comparison shows a characteristic of high Qg and low thermal resistance. This implies the substitution may alter the system's loss distribution: the ST solution offers lower switching losses, while the Infineon solution may have better potential for handling continuous high current with lower thermal rise. The overall efficiency, however, is highly dependent on application frequency and duty cycle.
Analysis ID: 8B9C-B46B000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com