LM2904AQTH-13 Substitution Conclusion Based on comparative analysis, substituting LM358PWRG4-JF with LM2904AQTH-13 is generally feasible from an electrical performance standpoint. However, the following technical differences must be considered: The substitute offers a wider supply voltage range (2V–36V vs. 3V–30V for the original), enabling operation in lower or higher supply environments and increasing design flexibility. Its lower input offset voltage (2 mV vs. 3 mV) helps reduce DC error and improves the accuracy of amplification circuits. On the other hand, the substitute exhibits a higher supply current (700µA per channel vs. 500µA per channel), which increases overall power consumption and may affect battery life in portable applications. Additionally, LM2904AQTH-13 is qualified to the automotive-grade AEC-Q100 standard, having passed more stringent reliability and environmental tests, making it suitable for harsh applications such as automotive systems. The original part is a general-purpose industrial-grade device. For non-automotive applications where power consumption is critical, substitution should be evaluated carefully. However, in designs requiring wide supply voltage range, higher precision, or automotive-grade reliability, LM2904AQTH-13 represents a valid alternative.