(HKG) +86 755 8277 4696
WhatsAppWhatsApp
English
SkyChip
0
Original Part

Standard Amplifier 2 Circuit Rail-to-Rail 8-MiniSO

Quote
Alternative Part

Standard Amplifier 2 Circuit Rail-to-Rail 8-VSSOP

Quote

CMOS Amplifier 2 Circuit Rail-to-Rail 8-MSOP

Quote
1. OPA2313IDGK Substitution Conclusion The OPA2313IDGK can serve as a drop‑in replacement for the TS1872AIST, provided the application is carefully evaluated. Its lower slew rate (0.5 V/µs vs. 0.6 V/µs for the original) and lower gain‑bandwidth product (1 MHz vs. 1.8 MHz) may limit performance in high‑frequency or fast‑transient applications, making it unsuitable for high‑speed signal processing. However, its extremely low input bias current (0.2 pA vs. 70 nA) and low input offset voltage (500 µV vs. 1 mV) can significantly improve accuracy and reduce input‑referred error, making it well‑suited for precision circuits such as high‑impedance sensor interfaces. The lower supply current (50 µA per channel vs. 500 µA per channel) greatly reduces power consumption, which is advantageous for battery‑powered systems. On the other hand, its weaker output current capability (15 mA vs. 80 mA) may be insufficient to drive heavy loads, and the maximum supply voltage of 5.5 V (vs. 6 V) precludes use in 6 V systems. In summary, the OPA2313IDGK can replace the TS1872AIST in low‑power, high‑precision, medium‑to‑low‑speed applications operating at or below 5.5 V; otherwise, the driver stage or supply section would require redesign.
2. AZV832MMTR‑G1 Substitution Conclusion The AZV832MMTR‑G1 is a highly feasible drop‑in replacement for the TS1872AIST in the same package, though key performance differences must be considered. Its CMOS architecture provides extremely low input bias current (1 pA vs. 70 nA) and low input offset voltage (500 µV vs. 1 mV), along with superior input impedance and precision, making it suitable for high‑sensitivity signal amplification. The slew rate (0.45 V/µs vs. 0.6 V/µs) and gain‑bandwidth product (1 MHz vs. 1.8 MHz) are slightly lower, which may degrade performance in high‑speed applications. On the positive side, its output current capability is significantly higher (185 mA vs. 80 mA), enabling it to drive heavier loads such as motors or LEDs. The total supply current is also lower (70 µA vs. an estimated 1000 µA for the original), contributing to power savings. However, the maximum supply voltage of 5.5 V (vs. 6 V) restricts use in 6 V systems, and differences between CMOS and the original standard amplifier architecture could affect noise or stability behavior. Overall, if the application does not require 6 V operation and can tolerate slightly lower speed, the AZV832 is an excellent substitute, particularly in scenarios demanding high output drive and low power consumption.
Analysis ID: C589-19BE000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com