Original Part
Alternative Part
1. LM2902DRE4 Substitution Conclusion
From a core functionality perspective, the LM2902DRE4 can serve as an alternative candidate. However, its feasibility is highly dependent on the specific application circuit conditions. Key technical differences are as follows: First, the supply voltage range. The NJM3403 supports 4-36V, whereas the LM2902DRE4 is limited to 3-26V. If the original design operates above 26V, this substitution will cause malfunction or damage. Second, the slew rate. The NJM3403's 1.2 V/µs is 2.4 times faster than the LM2902DRE4's 0.5 V/µs. This indicates the LM2902DRE4 will respond more slowly when processing large-amplitude, fast-changing signals, potentially leading to output waveform distortion. Third, the input offset voltage. The LM2902DRE4 is slightly higher (3mV vs. 2mV), which has a minor negative impact on DC precision. Conversely, its input bias current (20nA) is significantly better than the original part's (70nA), benefiting applications with high-impedance signal sources. Additionally, the two parts have different package widths (5.00mm vs. 3.90mm), requiring a re-evaluation of the PCB layout. If the application circuit operates at a supply voltage ≤26V and does not demand high signal processing speed, this substitution is generally feasible from an electrical functionality standpoint, though package compatibility must be addressed.
2. LM2902DRG4 Substitution Conclusion
The substitution conclusion for the LM2902DRG4 relative to the NJM3403AM is identical to that for the LM2902DRE4, as both parts share the same key performance parameters. The LM2902DRG4 similarly faces the primary limitations of a reduced supply voltage ceiling (26V vs. 36V), a significantly lower slew rate (0.5 V/µs vs. 1.2 V/µs), and a mismatched package footprint (3.90mm wide vs. 5.00mm wide). Its advantage likewise lies in the lower input bias current (20nA). The suffix difference between "DRG4" and "DRE4" typically denotes non-electrical characteristics such as reel packaging, environmental standards, or manufacturing flow, and does not affect the core performance of the die. Therefore, the criteria for judging substitution feasibility remain consistent: substitution can only be considered for applications where the supply voltage does not exceed 26V and the circuit is not critical of op-amp speed, and the physical package compatibility issue must be resolved.
Analysis ID: 4B5D-B844000
Based on part parameters and for reference only. Not to be used for procurement or production.
SkyChip © 2026, Email: sales@skychip.com